Author + information
- Received June 10, 2019
- Revision received September 18, 2019
- Accepted September 18, 2019
- Published online February 17, 2020.
- Jorge Romero, MDa,
- Andrea Natale, MDb,
- Luis Cerna, MDa,
- Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MDc,
- Juan Carlos Diaz, MDa,
- Isabella Alviz, MDa,
- Vito Grupposo, RTa,
- Saul A. Rios, MDa,
- Elizabeth Chernobelsky, BSca,
- Nestor Lopez Cabanillas, MDa,
- Mario Garcia, MDa and
- Luigi Di Biase, MD, PhDa,b,∗ ()
- aMontefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
- bTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St. David’s Medical Center, Austin, Texas
- cKansas City Heart Rhythm Institute at Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) Midwest Health, Kansas City, Missouri
- ↵∗Address for correspondence:
Dr. Luigi Di Biase, Electrophysiology Department, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 East 210th Street, Bronx, New York 10467.
Objectives This study sought to determine the distance between the anterior wall of the left atrial appendage (LAA) ostium to the left main coronary artery (LMCA) and the left circumflex artery (LCx) in patients undergoing left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI).
Background LAAEI improves outcomes in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation. There is a potential risk of damaging the LMCA and the LCx during LAAEI.
Methods Patients undergoing LAAEI during the period between January 1, 2017 and October 31, 2018, were included in this study. Patients underwent cardiac computed tomography prior to ablation. The position of the LAA was analyzed. The closest distances between the LMCA, its bifurcation, LCx, and the anterior wall of the LAA ostium were measured. Additionally, imaging integration was performed to localize these vessels and catheter ablation was performed at least 5 mm away.
Results A total of 74 patients (mean age: 68 ± 9.5 years; male 54%) who underwent LAAEI were included. The mean distance from the anterior wall of the LAA ostium to the LMCA was 7.88 ± 2.8 mm, to the LMCA bifurcation was 9.24 ± 4.40 mm, and to the LCx was 10.03 ± 4.56 mm. The LCx artery was found along the LAA ostium in 98% of the cases, whereas the LMCA was found in only 48.6%. No coronary damage or vasospasm was observed after performing LAAEI.
Conclusions A detailed imaging integration with cardiac computed tomography, electroanatomic mapping, and CARTOSOUND reconstructions to accurately define the anatomical relationship between the LMCA and LCx and the anterior edge of the LAA ostium should be performed prior to delivering radiofrequency energy during LAAEI. When the distance on cardiac computed tomography between the LAA ostium and left coronary arteries is >10 mm, intraprocedural localization of these vessels may be not necessary.
- left atrial appendage
- left circumflex coronary artery
- long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation
- persistent atrial fibrillation
- radiofrequency ablation
Dr. Natale has received honoraria for consulting and speaking services from Biosense Webster, Medtronic, Biotronik, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Baylis Medical, and Kalila Medical. Dr. Di Biase has received consulting fees from Biosense Webster; and has received speaking or travel honoraria from Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Biotronik, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.
The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology author instructions page.
- Received June 10, 2019.
- Revision received September 18, 2019.
- Accepted September 18, 2019.
This article requires a subscription or purchase to view the full text. If you are a subscriber or member, click Login or the Subscribe link (top menu above) to access this article.